sharetrader
Page 517 of 517 FirstFirst ... 17417467507513514515516517
Results 5,161 to 5,170 of 5170
  1. #5161
    Membaa
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    5,647

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Newman View Post
    Aperitif: where does the divestment/mothball information come from?
    https://www.synlait.com/wp-content/u...2024-FINAL.pdf

  2. #5162
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    22,454

    Default

    Thanks, Baa_Baa.

    Begs the question then what the plant would be used for if the milk supply is sold to Open Country Dairy?

  3. #5163
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    190

    Default

    More Notes:

    Pro forma capital raise $310mm Debt
    a2 and abbott buy to form a JV $300-400mm, Synlait debt free and shareholders happy.
    Milk supply not an issue and advanced nutrition facility (have MVM supply) less favorable conditions in NI, fonterra also...
    Purchase Bodco B&C facility circa $40-50mm with (SAMR license under Pharmalac brand) and do brand swap, close association with MVM(circa 5% stake)

    Abbott - a2 have indirect product diversification through Abbotts plant based initiatives and the Pediasure brand which is ironically the same color(purple) and have massive ambition also in adult nutrition. NZ FTA agreement handy here. Not to mention the USA opportunity for IF and higher margin products. Im sure they must have been interested last year when Synlait were "exploring options", makes you think if Bortolussi has had a "chat" to Abbott's team...Pulled out of China IF market 2023, strategic stake in a2? Exploring M&A -chat in their previous call, cashed up.

  4. #5164
    ShareTrader Legend bull....'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    11,549

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aperitif View Post
    More Notes:

    Pro forma capital raise $310mm Debt
    a2 and abbott buy to form a JV $300-400mm, Synlait debt free and shareholders happy.
    Milk supply not an issue and advanced nutrition facility (have MVM supply) less favorable conditions in NI, fonterra also...
    Purchase Bodco B&C facility circa $40-50mm with (SAMR license under Pharmalac brand) and do brand swap, close association with MVM(circa 5% stake)

    Abbott - a2 have indirect product diversification through Abbotts plant based initiatives and the Pediasure brand which is ironically the same color(purple) and have massive ambition also in adult nutrition. NZ FTA agreement handy here. Not to mention the USA opportunity for IF and higher margin products. Im sure they must have been interested last year when Synlait were "exploring options", makes you think if Bortolussi has had a "chat" to Abbott's team...Pulled out of China IF market 2023, strategic stake in a2? Exploring M&A -chat in their previous call, cashed up.
    makes sense what you saying in regard to pokeno. how about joint ownership by a2 and synliat ?
    one step ahead of the herd

  5. #5165
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2023
    Posts
    358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bull.... View Post
    makes sense what you saying in regard to pokeno. how about joint ownership by a2 and synliat ?
    That seems a better fit?

  6. #5166
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    22,454

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bikeguy View Post
    That seems a better fit?
    Effectively already joint ownership post CR with the two owning 85%.

  7. #5167
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2023
    Posts
    358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Effectively already joint ownership post CR with the two owning 85%.
    Fair point😅

  8. #5168
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    472

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Effectively already joint ownership post CR with the two owning 85%.
    Would selling Pokeno to a buyer other than A2 Milk require the approval of 75% of shareholders? With 20% shareholding, A2 Milk could effectively restrict what Synlait could do.

  9. #5169
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    472

    Default

    In his Taking Stock newsletter, Chris Lee wrote:

    THE Bright Dairy/ATM proposed solution for Synlait Milk recognises that Synlait’s assets and business model have real value, well in excess of debt.

    It recognises that Bright and a2 Milk are the relevant long-term beneficiaries of the business model and that Synlait’s survival must be underwritten by the two beneficiaries. The solution ensures the bond holders are repaid, and must be repaid prematurely, if the proposed solution wins shareholder voting support.

    And the solution provides the motivation for all shareholders to regard Synlait in the future as being the equivalent of a private company, run for the benefit of the major shareholders.

    My plan, were I an owner of SML securities, would be:

    To request bond repayment when available from 1-15 October.
    To sell immediately my shares at whatever price I could get.
    If the proposed restructure means survival, it would mean farmers would retain access to pricing tension when selling their milk production, Fonterra an obvious choice.

    And it would mean Synlait’s nett revenue could be split up by Bright and a2 Milk, possibly with a structure that suits Bright and China, as well as a2 Milk.

    The prospect of the nett surplus being created to share amongst thousands of external shareholders would seem to me to be unlikely.

    I am in total disagreement with the NZ Shareholders Association. I know no retail investor who would want to participate in a rights issue in the hope of being treated equally in the future.

    Sell, and start again, would seem a logical step.

  10. #5170
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    94

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Newman View Post
    In his Taking Stock newsletter, Chris Lee wrote:

    ...
    I am in total disagreement with the NZ Shareholders Association. I know no retail investor who would want to participate in a rights issue in the hope of being treated equally in the future.
    Huh.

    Would those retail investors be somehow worse off, if given the choice to participate in the CR, chose not to?

    What about if holders were issued tradable rights, as was once common?

    IMHO, there's a worrying precedent being set here, where minority shareholders (e.g., a2 and Bright) can collude to effectively take over a company, by issuing themselves equity at a deeply discounted price, and without compensating remaining holders a cent - and somehow everyone is OK with that.

    GLTAH, of this and every other listed company.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •