sharetrader
Page 244 of 244 FirstFirst ... 144194234240241242243244
Results 2,431 to 2,432 of 2432
  1. #2431
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    579

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by see weed View Post
    Hi ziggy415 lol. I have a good accountant for over 25 years, who did apprenticeship with the IRD as an auditor. So no problems there and live off the interest from investments but am down a wee bit on SPK but who isn't. If it goes any lower will have to start a 3.50s club.
    Sorry seeweed i cant join the 3.50 club but i will join the 4.50 club and at the time of purchase i thought it was an exclusive club 🤔

  2. #2432
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,671

    Default FY2024 redundancies and resultant wage savings

    Quote Originally Posted by bull.... View Post
    The figure of $50m staff savings, is that a net figure after redundancy costs ?
    Redundancy costs are generally paid out in one year, whereas resultant salary savings carry on every year perpetually after. There were significant redundancy costs over FY2024, although these do not appear to have been separately declared. If you look at employee remuneration (AR2024 p77), you will see that the number of employees earning $100,000+ per year jumped from 215 to an astonishing 2688 over one year. However, this increase was largely due to the number of redundancy payments made over FY2024.

    Taking the incremental increase in each wage band, and multiplying that number by the mid point of the wage band, then adding the result of all wage bands together will give us an estimate of the costs saved in making high salaried employees redundant. Above the $370.001 to $380,000 wage band, there were no significant increase in the numbers in those wage groupings.

    Wage Band Average Incremental Employees Wage Bill Saved
    $105k 281 $29.505m
    $115k 272 $31.280m
    $125k 287 $35.875m
    $135k 256 $34.560m
    $145k 281 $40.745m
    $155k 260 $40.300m
    $165k 193 $31.845m
    $175k 128 $22.400m
    $185k 107 $19.795m
    $195k 95 $18.525m
    $205k 46 $9.430m
    $215k 54 $11.610m
    $225k 37 $8.325m
    $235k 34 $7.990m
    $245k 14 $3.430m
    $255k 12 $3.060m
    $265k 11 $2.915m
    $275k 8 $2.200m
    $285k 4 $1.140m
    $295k 11 $3.245m
    $305k 11 $3.355m
    $315k 15 $4.725m
    $325k 3 $0.975m
    $335k 5 $1,675m
    $345k 5 $1.725m
    $355k 2 $0.710m
    $365k 3 $1.095m
    $375k 3 $1.125m
    Total $373.56m

    The total labour bill at Spark over FY2024 was $512m. Of course not all of that incremental total will represent wages. It will be wages and redundancy costs. The added total will also incorporate wage inflation over the year.
    If we take wage inflation to be 7%, the actual 'like with like' savings in wages between FY2023 and FY2024, I estimate to be:

    (1-0.07)($373.56m/2)= $174m

    The actual wage bill saved will be less than this, because this 'saving' doesn't include wages that will be paid out to new employees hired over FY2025. So in this context, an ongoing saving in the wage bill of $50m per year looks reasonable and achievable.

    SNOOPY
    Last edited by Snoopy; Today at 08:29 PM.
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •