Was this the start of a US Presidential campaign

[ynot]

Harris has agreed to be interviewed.

She will not do it live.
She will not do it alone. Her man (questionable) Tim has to hold her hand.

What does that say about her. The next president...... Joke.

And now shes backtracking saying she will build a WALL !!!!! Clueless.

Meanwhile Harris has had her 1st interview since her presidential nomination.

She rattled on about instigating and making changes to various key points if she wins the election, none of which she or Biden have addressed in their current term. All talk and no action.

[Daytr]

A typical personal abuse post from you and not worth answering. You constantly talk about people you disagree with as being either dumb, ill informed, conspiracy theorists etc etc.
Get off your high horse.

Please point out the personal abuse in my post?

[jonu]

Who was POTUS at the time? -- TRUMP!
Who was AG at the time? -- BARR!

What had this to do with the Democrats? -- NOTHING!

Why was the FBI acting in the manner that it did? The same FBI alleging Russian disinformation as it did around the 2016 election. That source has been tracked back to Hillary Clinton's office. Why is the FBI doing the bidding of Clinton or showing any skew towards the Democrats? Why wasn't Hunter Biden's and the wider Biden family's corrupt practises looked at without bias? What expertise did Hunter have to serve on Eastern European energy companies? Why did the mayor of Moscow's wife give money to the Bidens? Why did MSM dismiss the laptop story as fabrication? The NY Post was about the only outlet to stay on it.

So much for the integrity of the NY Times and The Washington Post. Same two assured us Biden was fit for a second term, as did Kamala Harris.

[Daytr]

Why was the FBI acting in the manner that it did? The same FBI alleging Russian disinformation as it did around the 2016 election. That source has been tracked back to Hillary Clinton's office. Why is the FBI doing the bidding of Clinton or showing any skew towards the Democrats? Why wasn't Hunter Biden's and the wider Biden family's corrupt practises looked at without bias? What expertise did Hunter have to serve on Eastern European energy companies? Why did the mayor of Moscow's wife give money to the Bidens? Why did MSM dismiss the laptop story as fabrication? The NY Post was about the only outlet to stay on it.

So much for the integrity of the NY Times and The Washington Post. Same two assured us Biden was fit for a second term, as did Kamala Harris.

The FBI have said why because of previous Russian interference. How many times does that need to be said before you stop ignoring it.

You also ignore that the NY Post is owned by Murdoch who has a history of trying to influence elections. For many years in the UK if a PM candidate didn't get Rupert's nod of approval he would set his media empire on you.

The laptop copy & it was a copy that makes a significant difference as it could have been tampered with, was supplied to the NY Post by Giuliani. Again strange how you don't mention that.

Many other publications didn't run with the story as they questioned it's veracity, in fact the NY Post became the story due to its lack of vetting and fact checking.

But hey these are just reasonable questions and anyone reasonable and with an open mind would ask. Strange that none of your posts mention any of this....

[davflaws]

Why was the FBI acting in the manner that it did? The same FBI alleging Russian disinformation as it did around the 2016 election. That source has been tracked back to Hillary Clinton's office.

The FBI acted as it did because it had very good evidence that Russia had massively interfered in the 2016 election on behalf of Trump. Their concern was well justified, and had no connection with Hilary Clinton.

The Republican led and controlled Senate Committee Report on Russian interference in the 2016 Election was damning. Do you accept the conclusions?

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politic...16-us-election

[jonu]

The FBI acted as it did because it had very good evidence that Russia had massively interfered in the 2016 election on behalf of Trump. Their concern was well justified, and had no connection with Hilary Clinton.

The Republican led and controlled Senate Committee Report on Russian interference in the 2016 Election was damning. Do you accept the conclusions?

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politic...16-us-election

The report says it purposely didn't make any final conclusions. Certainly does not look good for campaign managers to meet with possible intelligence people, but if the information given was only internal polling it's not what you would call damning. He was however a campaign manager, not the FBI being partisan. The report also criticises the FBI for its biased handling of the Steele dossier which alleged the Russian connection. Steele's work was financed by the Democrats, hence the connection to Clinton's office.

Who would you expect to be dealing in information in an election campaign? A campaign manager or the FBI? Sounds like a hot mess of corruption.

[Panda-NZ-]

She rattled on about instigating and making changes to various key points if she wins the election, none of which she or Biden have addressed in their current term. All talk and no action.

We all know Mike Pence had a key role in the first Trump term.. give me a break.

Neither Mike or Kamala have much influence in what went on.