sharetrader
Page 514 of 515 FirstFirst ... 14414464504510511512513514515 LastLast
Results 5,131 to 5,140 of 5146
  1. #5131
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2023
    Posts
    354

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackcap View Post
    Using the closing price of $0.40, Bright are adding in $ at $0.60.

    Current market cap is $86m. Bright/A2 are adding $218m meaning new value of company is $304m

    If you have say 1,000 shares right now, your "value" is $400.

    Post this "recapitalisation" your $1000 shares are worth circa $506.

    (384m shares plus existing 216m shares makes a total of 600 million shares, dividing new value of enterpirse of $304m by 600m gives per share valuation of $0.506)

    Thus there is no dilution and as a retail shareholder you are actually better off.
    Legend, many thanks Blackcap

  2. #5132
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Can someone please explain how/why A2 picked up shares at 43c, when Bright paid 60c?

  3. #5133
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    22,435

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mel View Post
    Can someone please explain how/why A2 picked up shares at 43c, when Bright paid 60c?
    Because Bright is paying a premium for taking majority control.

  4. #5134
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    38,661

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mel View Post
    Can someone please explain how/why A2 picked up shares at 43c, when Bright paid 60c?
    Probably to do with maintaining their 20% holding …. While keeping total $ raised to a certain amount ..and Bright control premium
    Last edited by winner69; Today at 09:04 AM.
    ”When investors are euphoric, they are incapable of recognising euphoria itself “

  5. #5135
    Legend
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Bolivia.
    Posts
    5,254

    Default

    I wonder if under the revised shareholder structure if A2 will have anyone on the board?

  6. #5136
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    93

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Because Bright is paying a premium for taking majority control.
    A stealth takeover premium for a stealth takeover.

  7. #5137
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    466

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sideshow Bob View Post
    I wonder if under the revised shareholder structure if A2 will have anyone on the board?
    A2 milk would say goodbye to Synlait within a few years.

  8. #5138
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    4,657

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moimoi View Post
    As a matter of course every existing shareholder should be given the opportunity to participate in a re-capitalisation of the company they are invested in.!!
    Before that happens if I was a share holder I would want to know what is the viability of their Pokeno plant, its not covering costs yet, its farmers are leaving in droves as they do not pay what Fonterra does and its not the greatest area of dairy farming even though they haul milk from a wide area. Farmers will always go to who ever pays the best and highest price even though they have to give 2 years to leave.

  9. #5139
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    london, , United Kingdom.
    Posts
    1,490

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bulltrap View Post
    A stealth takeover premium for a stealth takeover.
    Not the right words for someone 'saving' the company.
    A2 will get what the need.

    Retail investors are cornered. They can decide to stay cornered or alternatively save themselves the stress and get out and reinvest in a company that is not effectively privately owned.

    I think it's a very positive outcome given the debt stress. It's like winning the lottery.

  10. #5140
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    93

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Toddy View Post
    I think it's a very positive outcome given the debt stress. It's like winning the lottery.
    It's a small win for those who paid lottery ticket prices for the shares or bonds.

    For the retail shareholders who paid a premium to NTA for a solid business, liquidation value should've been their worst-case outcome. But now they're unlikely to get that.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •