-
Yesterday, 02:40 PM
#21761
Originally Posted by Baa_Baa
Check out these tailwinds
The tsunami is coming
-
Yesterday, 03:37 PM
#21762
Member
Originally Posted by Greekwatchdog
The tsunami is coming
Wow that sounds ominous, and is that bad for oca? (tsunamis generally are not good are they?)
-
Yesterday, 03:54 PM
#21763
Originally Posted by Cupsy
Wow that sounds ominous, and is that bad for oca? (tsunamis generally are not good are they?)
This will be good for the sector
-
Yesterday, 08:01 PM
#21764
Originally Posted by Daytr
Yep, but it wasn't worth $1.60.
Correct.
It was probably worth well north of that.
-
Yesterday, 09:00 PM
#21765
Originally Posted by ValueNZ
Correct.
It was probably worth well north of that.
Funny guy, if you want to be taken seriously I suggest not posting crap.
Hopefully you find my posts helpful, but in no way should they be construed as advice. Make your own decision.
-
Yesterday, 09:21 PM
#21766
Originally Posted by Daytr
Funny guy, if you want to be taken seriously I suggest not posting crap.
Not posting crap
And I seriously could care less if I'm taken seriously on an anonymous forum
-
Yesterday, 09:22 PM
#21767
Originally Posted by Daytr
Really!
Wow just highlights how big their liabilities are.
Those "liabilities" are better than equity.
-
Yesterday, 09:36 PM
#21768
Originally Posted by Baa_Baa
Check out these tailwinds
I used to think I wanted to live forever (100+), I cant see myself lasting anywhere near that. People I know who have lived a healthy lifestyle are actually worn out and dying early 80s
-
Yesterday, 10:01 PM
#21769
Originally Posted by ValueNZ
Those "liabilities" are better than equity.
This seems to be a difficult concept for some to get their heads around, just because accounting standards insist on ORA being held on Balance Sheet as a liability.
They would rather focus on minutiae of operational cashflows, of 'care' that isn't the real business (property), or the debt which is well within acceptable norms of large scale property developers and easily sustainable at secured interest rates.
They seem immune to any notion of the ORA being non-callable, ever-growing, never repaid by company shareholders, held at no interest, and leveragable for growth. Or the tailwind of massive increases in addressable market for decades to come.
All because they don't like the person who brought it to their attention, when actually it's been in plain sight since RYM invented it decades ago.
-
Yesterday, 10:16 PM
#21770
Originally Posted by Baa_Baa
This seems to be a difficult concept for some to get their heads around, just because accounting standards insist on ORA being held on Balance Sheet as a liability.
They would rather focus on minutiae of operational cashflows, of 'care' that isn't the real business (property), or the debt which is well within acceptable norms of large scale property developers and easily sustainable at secured interest rates.
They seem immune to any notion of the ORA being non-callable, ever-growing, never repaid by company shareholders, held at no interest, and leveragable for growth. Or the tailwind of massive increases in addressable market for decades to come.
All because they don't like the person who brought it to their attention, when actually it's been in plain sight since RYM invented it decades ago.
Baa_Baa you have a vivid imagination.
Making up the rational of others.
You are talented.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks