OCA - Oceania Group - retirement villages

[Greekwatchdog]

Check out these tailwinds

The tsunami is coming

[Cupsy]

The tsunami is coming

Wow that sounds ominous, and is that bad for oca? (tsunamis generally are not good are they?)

[Greekwatchdog]

Wow that sounds ominous, and is that bad for oca? (tsunamis generally are not good are they?)

This will be good for the sector

[ValueNZ]

Yep, but it wasn't worth $1.60.

Correct.

It was probably worth well north of that.

[Daytr]

Correct.

It was probably worth well north of that.

Funny guy, if you want to be taken seriously I suggest not posting crap.

[ValueNZ]

Funny guy, if you want to be taken seriously I suggest not posting crap.

Not posting crap

And I seriously could care less if I'm taken seriously on an anonymous forum

[ValueNZ]

Really!
Wow just highlights how big their liabilities are.

Those "liabilities" are better than equity.

[Habits]

Check out these tailwinds

I used to think I wanted to live forever (100+), I cant see myself lasting anywhere near that. People I know who have lived a healthy lifestyle are actually worn out and dying early 80s

[Baa_Baa]

Those "liabilities" are better than equity.

This seems to be a difficult concept for some to get their heads around, just because accounting standards insist on ORA being held on Balance Sheet as a liability.

They would rather focus on minutiae of operational cashflows, of 'care' that isn't the real business (property), or the debt which is well within acceptable norms of large scale property developers and easily sustainable at secured interest rates.

They seem immune to any notion of the ORA being non-callable, ever-growing, never repaid by company shareholders, held at no interest, and leveragable for growth. Or the tailwind of massive increases in addressable market for decades to come.

All because they don't like the person who brought it to their attention, when actually it's been in plain sight since RYM invented it decades ago.

[Daytr]

This seems to be a difficult concept for some to get their heads around, just because accounting standards insist on ORA being held on Balance Sheet as a liability.

They would rather focus on minutiae of operational cashflows, of 'care' that isn't the real business (property), or the debt which is well within acceptable norms of large scale property developers and easily sustainable at secured interest rates.

They seem immune to any notion of the ORA being non-callable, ever-growing, never repaid by company shareholders, held at no interest, and leveragable for growth. Or the tailwind of massive increases in addressable market for decades to come.

All because they don't like the person who brought it to their attention, when actually it's been in plain sight since RYM invented it decades ago.

Baa_Baa you have a vivid imagination.
Making up the rational of others.
You are talented.