-
26-07-2024, 04:55 PM
#1801
LOL indeed sir.
"black swan" a phrase often underestimated I believe.
Im intrigued "of u".
I suppose after loosing a wee bit to RJI in the mid late 80s I became quite blunt and cynical towards the SM in general.
But I have remained invested over the decades.
We should have a fanta one day.
-
26-07-2024, 05:48 PM
#1802
Member
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by troyvdh
LOL indeed sir.
"black swan" a phrase often underestimated I believe.
Im intrigued "of u".
I suppose after loosing a wee bit to RJI in the mid late 80s I became quite blunt and cynical towards the SM in general.
But I have remained invested over the decades.
We should have a fanta one day.
Yes the RJI debacle was an education for many of us. We no longer have these corporate 'mesiahs' such as Jones, Newland, Hawkins, Judge, Brierley etc to lead us to the promised land. And thank god for that.
-
26-07-2024, 06:17 PM
#1803
And that I believe is the main reason why NZ inc despises the SM.
The most to blame ?
I believe it was the legislative/commerce bodies (of both parties) shockingly pathetic dismal performance in failing to govern properly.
Like hawkins/judge in particular ....and even after that what about Hanover ....and South canterbury finance...I weep.
-
26-07-2024, 06:20 PM
#1804
RIP Brian Gaynor.
I could be wrong but I believe he was battling watson/hotchin (maggots) in the courts.
After he was critical of their business practice likening it to a "pyramid scheme"...
Last edited by troyvdh; 26-07-2024 at 06:38 PM.
-
26-07-2024, 07:17 PM
#1805
Member
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by troyvdh
And that I believe is the main reason why NZ inc despises the SM.
The most to blame ?
I believe it was the legislative/commerce bodies (of both parties) shockingly pathetic dismal performance in failing to govern properly.
Like hawkins/judge in particular ....and even after that what about Hanover ....and South canterbury finance...I weep.
Yeah I lost money on South Canterbury Finance. I never had money with them but I pay taxes and the NZ govt paid out $1.6bn to bail out depositers.
-
26-07-2024, 08:14 PM
#1806
How weird is that...Seldom am I speechless...cheers.
-
26-07-2024, 08:58 PM
#1807
Fanta does not cut a mustard for me anymore..lol
Whisky and lap dance...lol
-
26-07-2024, 09:50 PM
#1808
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by kiwikeith
Yeah I lost money on South Canterbury Finance. I never had money with them but I pay taxes and the NZ govt paid out $1.6bn to bail out depositers.
The full story is in this book.Most public libraries have it.
The Billion Dollar Bonfire
Author Chris Lee
The collapse of South Canterbury Finance (SCF) is one of the biggest New Zealand stories of the last decade. The sweep of events, from Timaru to the Beehive, includes some of the most revealing moments on issues critical to this country - from poor governance and systemic uses in the finance sector, through to the structural risks this exposed and the costs it ultimately presented to all New Zealander's
Last edited by percy; 26-07-2024 at 09:52 PM.
-
27-07-2024, 03:42 PM
#1809
'systemic issues...'
A couple of book sites have missed out the 'is'
-
28-07-2024, 09:19 PM
#1810
Member
Anyone got any ideas on a scenario that could see the offer increased ?
At the current price I think I'd just ride it out for the 1.70.
But just trying to decide if there could be any further upside.
The obvious scenario is a second buyer. But if shareholders reject the existing (seems unlikely). What has history taught us regarding the chance of the offer increasing?
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks