-
Yesterday, 09:27 PM
#21701
You would think if the SP went up by 60%, the Stock Exchange would requuest a please explain if there is any reason, such as a takeover approach. In a cynical way, I hope the SP hasnt been manipulated up to these dizzying heights so quickly in preparation for a capital raise at a decent level.
Why doesnt the company issue any advice or reasons for the increase.
-
Yesterday, 09:32 PM
#21702
Why raise capital??? OCA doesn't need to raise capital
-
Yesterday, 09:34 PM
#21703
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by bottomfeeder
You would think if the SP went up by 60%, the Stock Exchange would requuest a please explain if there is any reason, such as a takeover approach. In a cynical way, I hope the SP hasnt been manipulated up to these dizzying heights so quickly in preparation for a capital raise at a decent level.
Why doesnt the company issue any advice or reasons for the increase.
OCA doesn't need a capital raise...
-
Yesterday, 10:12 PM
#21704
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by X-men
Why raise capital??? OCA doesn't need to raise capital
Everyone wants to raise capital. If OCA doesnt need more capital, why dont they pay a dividend.
-
Yesterday, 10:18 PM
#21705
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by bottomfeeder
Everyone wants to raise capital. If OCA doesnt need more capital, why dont they pay a dividend.
If Berkshire doesn't need more capital, why don't they pay a dividend
-
Yesterday, 11:22 PM
#21706
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by ValueNZ
If Berkshire doesn't need more capital, why don't they pay a dividend
Berkshire is a totally different kettle of fish to OCA. Not sure about US taxation compared to NZ either.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks