Was this the start of a US Presidential campaign

[Baa_Baa]

The lying Fornicator after the bravado - can’t even handle a little nick on his ear?

There's another photo circulating on X.com of a bullet hole in his suit jacket, right side about mid torso. It may be a doctored image who knows, but if it's real it would suggest he had a bullet proof vest on. Even then, an AR-15 bullet to the chest/vest would take the wind out.

[Balance]

There's another photo circulating on X.com of a bullet hole in his suit jacket, right side about mid torso. It may be a doctored image who knows, but if it's real it would suggest he had a bullet proof vest on. Even then, an AR-15 bullet to the chest/vest would take the wind out.

Fake news.

Zero mention of any second shot on his Fornicating body.

Trump is all showmanship, BS and bravado.

[Baa_Baa]

Fake news.

Zero mention of any second shot on his Fornicating body.

Trump is all showmanship, BS and bravado.

Yes probably, but neither the Secret Service nor Trumps party have confirmed or denied how many shots he took.

[Balance]

Yes probably, but neither the Secret Service nor Trumps party have confirmed or denied how many shots he took.

If there was a second shot on that Fornicating body, can be sure that he and the Republicans would have played it up like he rose from the dead.

A lot of myth making going on out there.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...en-depression/

Latest infor from FBI is that the shooter was casing out Biden and the British Royal Family as well, according to data on his mobile. Seems like Trump simply provided the best and easiest opportunity for him to attain notoriety. Poor deluded & deranged soul.

I personally am intrigued why there is such a fuss made about why there is the attempt on Trump. That is the USA! School shootings happen regularly.

What is shocking however of course is that the shooter was able to get so close to him.

[kiwikeith]

What is shocking however of course is that the shooter was able to get so close to him.

The secret service really dropped the ball. The shooter had been noticed long before he fired. There were multiple mistakes made. So many in fact, that I am surprised the conspiratory theorists are not suggesting Crooks was a stooge of a security services backed plan to terminate Trump.

But what a name - Crooks? Not since Madoff (who made off with the money) has there been such an aptly named criminal.

[Balance]

The secret service really dropped the ball. The shooter had been noticed long before he fired. There were multiple mistakes made. So many in fact, that I am surprised the conspiratory theorists are not suggesting Crooks was a stooge of a security services backed plan to terminate Trump.

But what a name - Crooks? Not since Madoff (who made off with the money) has there been such an aptly named criminal.

Crooks is more of a mental case rather than a criminal? A mental case who had access to that great American right of an assault weapon.

This is the ‘frightening’ enemy and face of the shooter that Trump wanted his followers to fight! How pathetic.

[Panda-NZ-]

The secret service really dropped the ball. The shooter had been noticed long before he fired. There were multiple mistakes made. So many in fact, that I am surprised the conspiratory theorists are not suggesting Crooks was a stooge of a security services backed plan to terminate Trump.

But what a name - Crooks? Not since Madoff (who made off with the money) has there been such an aptly named criminal.

If it was it would be more professional and anyone in certain states can get themselves a gun. The bar is so low.

Even mental cases, criminals & terrorists.

[Getty]

As in the lyrics of Elton John's tribute song to John Lennon, who died due to a madman,
"One insect can damage so much grain".

I intentionally left out the "It's funny how" lead in as although EJ meant funny as in odd, some may think it means funny ha ha.

[kiwikeith]

Crooks is more of a mental case rather than a criminal?

A criminal is someone who commits a crime. You can be found not guilty due to insanity. In my view all serial killers, for example, are nutters but criminals nevertheless.

A mental case has still committed a crime - but for him to be found not guilty due to insanity, it must be proven by the defense (not disproven by the prosecution) that the defendant did not know that what he was doing was wrong, or if he did, he had uncontrollable impulses. (or he is not mentally fit to stand trial at the time of the trial) In the US only 25% defences of not guilty pleas due to insanity are successful. So had Crooks lived, it is debatable whether he could have successfully pleaded not guilty due to insanity.

[Balance]

‘I had God on my side!’

Guess his god was on his side when Trump was Fornicating and lying?

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/hul...A6R3OIVNP4GXI/