-
 Originally Posted by Bjauck
Your claim was that he had turned from the Lord. A majority of American Catholics don’t think he has. The Roman Catholic Church is not the Lord. Jews and many other Christian denominations support abortion rights of women.
The Catholic church is not a democracy. You might argue the same of the US in its current state. The point is Biden who was previously strongly anti-abortion, mellowed his stance to get the VP, then abandoned his principles altogether to get a shot at the big job.
Christ was never out to win a popularity contest.
-
Originally Posted by jonu
The Catholic church is not a democracy. You might argue the same of the US in its current state. The point is Biden who was previously strongly anti-abortion, mellowed his stance to get the VP, then abandoned his principles altogether to get a shot at the big job.
Christ was never out to win a popularity contest.
Your were referring to Jesus Christ - not God?
I do understand the Catholic Church is run by appointed fallible celibate men. Biden is a politician, and they change their positions pragmatically. It is now contrary to the position of his Church.
God however does not belong to these officially celibate men of the Roman Catholic Church. So Biden’s acceptance of abortion rights for women does not necessarily mean that Biden has turned from The Lord.
Last edited by Bjauck; Yesterday at 09:48 PM.
-
Originally Posted by Bjauck
I do understand the Catholic Church is run by appointed fallible celibate men. Biden is a politician, and they change their positions pragmatically. It is now contrary to the position of his Church.
God however does not belong to these officially celibate men of the Roman Catholic Church. So Biden’s acceptance of abortion rights for women does not necessarily mean that Biden has turned from The Lord.
What is worse? Turning from his own principles? Suddenly it's OK to slaughter the unborn in their mother's womb? Maybe sleepy Joe doesn't sleep too well at night.
-
Originally Posted by jonu
What is worse? Turning from his own principles? Suddenly it's OK to slaughter the unborn in their mother's womb? Maybe sleepy Joe doesn't sleep too well at night.
Are you referring to embryos that are a dependant part of the mother, unviable out of the uterus?
-
What's the republican position on reducing child poverty and allievating the heavy burden that low-income american women have?
-
Originally Posted by jonu
What is worse? Turning from his own principles? Suddenly it's OK to slaughter the unborn in their mother's womb? Maybe sleepy Joe doesn't sleep too well at night.
The celibate men of the Roman Catholic Church would probably find Trump’s morals more objectionable. Of course Trump’s position on abortion has changed too.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ortion-rights/
-
Originally Posted by Panda-NZ-
What's the republican position on reducing child poverty and allievating the heavy burden that low-income american women have?
When the state enforces maternity on a woman, it literally becomes the nanny state, and should not shirk responsibility.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks