-
22-06-2024, 08:48 PM
#811
Originally Posted by davflaws
Let's just all be very very thankful that the "steering failure" occurred near Picton with only a few people aboard.
A "steering failure" in Cook Strait with a full complement of passengers would have been potentially bad, even in fine weather, and a failure in the approaches to Tory Channel or Wellington Harbour would have been horrendous. Add some moderate (for Cook Strait) weather and you are looking at potentially huge loss of life.
That is a risk you run on any vessel at any time. That is why good maintenance is of paramount importance to reduce such risks. Looking at Interislander's recent history, one has to question their ability to properly maintain their vessels.
-
23-06-2024, 08:20 AM
#812
Originally Posted by whatsup
IMHO dont you mean Helen Davis, she is/was married to Peter Davis !
Wonen are no longer the property of men. The patriarchy is crumbling?
-
23-06-2024, 09:24 AM
#813
Originally Posted by Bjauck
Wonen are no longer the property of men. The patriarchy is crumbling?
So are you saying if she used his name he would own her ?
-
23-06-2024, 10:06 AM
#814
Originally Posted by ynot
So are you saying if she used his name he would own her ?
Clearly that is what Bjauck meant - his mind still stuck in the dark ages.
-
23-06-2024, 10:12 AM
#815
Originally Posted by ynot
So are you saying if she used his name he would own her ?
No longer for husbands. I know women retain the right of surname choice. It seems Whatsup thinks or wishes otherwise.
-
23-06-2024, 10:14 AM
#816
Originally Posted by Balance
Clearly that is what Bjauck meant - his mind still stuck in the dark ages.
Just aware of history and the archaic attitudes held by some.
BTW I can speak for myself. I am not your “*itch”.
Last edited by Bjauck; 23-06-2024 at 10:35 AM.
-
23-06-2024, 10:32 AM
#817
Originally Posted by Bjauck
No longer for husbands. I know women retain the right of surname choice. It seems Whatsup thinks or wishes otherwise.
Keep on digging Bjauck. Any woman retaining her maiden name believing it will protect her from a tyrant is dreaming.
-
23-06-2024, 10:42 AM
#818
Originally Posted by ynot
Keep on digging Bjauck. Any woman retaining her maiden name believing it will protect her from a tyrant is dreaming.
Too true. Family abuse is still only too common. At least there are legal avenues available.
-
23-06-2024, 10:46 AM
#819
Originally Posted by Bjauck
Just aware of history and the archaic attitudes held by some.
BTW I can speak for myself. I am not your “*itch”.
Your history sucks as much as your archaic mindset.
“Coverture” is the word you need to familiarise yourself first before you make a fool of yourself.
https://www.brides.com/why-do-women-...t-name-5116974
-
23-06-2024, 10:59 AM
#820
Originally Posted by Balance
Google is not your friend.
Under English law (on which NZ law is based) until the late C19th, married women lost their separate legal rights. Decisions were made by the husband.
Clark made her own decision on her surname. Some seem to object to this.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks