-
19-06-2024, 10:47 PM
#21251
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by ValueNZ
42c seems arbitrary. What's with that?
We may never see 42c... But I hope we do.
It is so sad that the youth of today do not know the significance of 42.
A generation of unhoopy froods who have no idea where their towel is.
-
20-06-2024, 07:24 AM
#21252
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Snow Leopard
It is so sad that the youth of today do not know the significance of 42.
A generation of unhoopy froods who have no idea where their towel is.
![Sad](images/smilies/sad.gif)
If I have any available funds after the Infratil issue, I may add to my Oceania holding.
42 - significance being the number of the first black major league baseball player? Or. The Douglas Adams answer?
Personally I am more of a red dwarf fan, and prefer an Anglia to a Prefect!
Last edited by Bjauck; 20-06-2024 at 07:34 AM.
-
20-06-2024, 08:41 AM
#21253
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by ValueNZ
Hey Daytr, does this mean you agree with SailorRob and I that lower prices are in fact better than high.
Because you have spent a lot of time in the past arguing the opposite.
That is a very simplistic interpretation of what I have said.
What is obvious to everyone is that it depends on the outcome. Averaging down can be the worst or best thing to do, but either way it's a risky strategy.
If your view on the stock hasn't changed from when you first bought it then perhaps it's the right thing to do. However it's not without risk and this is where SailorBoy and I disagreed, he acted like there is no risk.
My recommendation would be to diversify risk, as effectively you are buying into the sector, certainly not the management, in fact I would say the management is one of the biggest risks, as they have under performed and the new CEO is untested.
So if I owned RYM, I might look at topping up with OCA, or vica versa, at 42c or equivalent, naturally. 😉
As I don't own either, I have the best position of all.
Last edited by Daytr; 20-06-2024 at 09:13 AM.
-
20-06-2024, 08:45 AM
#21254
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Bjauck
If I have any available funds after the Infratil issue, I may add to my Oceania holding.
42 - significance being the number of the first black major league baseball player? Or. The Douglas Adams answer?
Personally I am more of a red dwarf fan, and prefer an Anglia to a Prefect!
Definitely a Douglas Adam's reference.
Such a clever book.
-
20-06-2024, 10:19 AM
#21255
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Daytr
That is a very simplistic interpretation of what I have said.
What is obvious to everyone is that it depends on the outcome. Averaging down can be the worst or best thing to do, but either way it's a risky strategy.
If your view on the stock hasn't changed from when you first bought it then perhaps it's the right thing to do. However it's not without risk and this is where SailorBoy and I disagreed, he acted like there is no risk.
My recommendation would be to diversify risk, as effectively you are buying into the sector, certainly not the management, in fact I would say the management is one of the biggest risks, as they have under performed and the new CEO is untested.
So if I owned RYM, I might look at topping up with OCA, or vica versa, at 42c or equivalent, naturally.
As I don't own either, I have the best position of all.
Who and how have management underperformed? Which metrics have they underperformed on and what is this measured against. Cheers.
-
20-06-2024, 10:24 AM
#21256
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by ValueNZ
Who and how have management underperformed? Which metrics have they underperformed on and what is this measured against. Cheers.
I'm not going to waste my time on here stating the bleeding obvious. And I'm sure many on here will appreciate that.
Crikey, if you don't think management has underperformed, its no wonder you think this OCA is worth so much.
I have pointed out so many areas of concern over the last few months, but apparently none of that matters. The market obviously disagrees.
One last thing? Why has there been a change in CEO?
Last edited by Daytr; 20-06-2024 at 10:33 AM.
-
20-06-2024, 11:40 AM
#21257
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Daytr
At 42c I might get tempted.
Deeper value.
Institutional selling (out) and retail buying - only one way the sp is going until the instos stop selling and actually, start buying.
Downturn in property cycle still has at least a while more to go in the meantime.
-
20-06-2024, 12:05 PM
#21258
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by ValueNZ
Who and how have management underperformed? Which metrics have they underperformed on and what is this measured against. Cheers.
Brett failed badly to Shareholder Returns and Underlying EPS targets (AR says so)
Important targets I reckon and FAIL
”When investors are euphoric, they are incapable of recognising euphoria itself “
-
20-06-2024, 03:40 PM
#21259
Delusion..only dumb holders that keep wishing the share price down 👇👇👇
-
20-06-2024, 05:26 PM
#21260
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by ValueNZ
51c fellas. How low can it go?
I'm loving it.
still 51 pennies - you can't be buying enuff
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks