That's totally fine. I made the joke once that A2 Milk is for people with made up diseases.
Printable View
Broadly I might agree - in a western context. But that's not meant to be objectionable to those with lactose intolerance.
What gets me is studies that suggest being lactose tolerant is a genetic mutations from the last 10,000 years or so. Something that westerners who have been exposed to sheep, goats and cows and genetically evolved. Given asia (and Asians) havent been exposed to so much lactose (other than babies at birth) they have evolved with this lactose tolerance. Hence they err on being lactose intolerant.
So if the vast majority of Asians are said to be genetically lactose intolerant and A2 milk enables them to consume milk then this would be a huge market. A market where you wouldn't want to be wasting your resource by selling it to NZ'ers.
We should be keeping an eye out on the ongoing research in this area.
In the mena time if people "feel" a benefit from consuming A2 then good on them for keeping the share price up
If that stopped you investing in ATM, then the joke may be on you.
Remember, ATM was introduced into the Australian market during 'supermarket milk price wars' and despite not discounting, and despite charging a premium, ATM still achieved an amazing market share (estimated between 10 - 15% for raw milk and 30% for IF)
ATM doesn't need to resort to science (or discounted prices) to prove its market difference - the market is deciding the benefits of A2 for itself.
Nah I've been a shareholder for many years. One of my friends worked for A2 Milk early 2000's. I filled up my boots early 2015 but sold along the way to fund my first house but I still have enough.
It was meant to be a lighthearted joke. I had a bar/restaurant for years and the amount of made-up diseases I had to listen to were very funny in the most part.
I like your line "the market is deciding the benefits of A2 for itself" - I'm so confident that in a market like Australia a study could comprehensively show that A2 Milk has no benefits at all and yet customers would continued to buy. Branding is the key and in that aspect A2 Milk has kicked all the goals.
You got think of the bigger picture, and apply some reverse thinking. I see that A2 took out a blocking stake in Synlait because they are preventing the possibility of a taking over on Synlait, which could lead to a delisting from the NZX, and also potentially adversely impact the Synlait supply to A2. This is a medium term defensive play, and I would said a very good move by the management team, and to Ms Hrdlicka
The benefits are right there on the label. This is not a low fat watered down product with boosted calcium and increased sugar and salt levels. Supermarkets here are full of low grade variants that sell for $1 per L. It comes down to customer choice.
A2 or something else.
What bias?
A2 is ingested. It’s your taste buds that decide what you like.
Have you tried A2?
You can stretch your budget by making yoghurt and cream cheese and there is even enough whey left to soak your oats overnight. Your taste buds will light up and you will be incredibly satiated.
All milk is the same right?..???