Originally Posted by
Baa_Baa
I don't know what others think but I'm leaning towards your commentary, conjecture, flippancy and lack of research or reading being unhelpful.
At this important juncture for NTL, I would prefer to see people come together, analyse what has been published and what is known, rather than speculate on ill-informed potential outcomes.
By all means, debate the interpretations, that is the luxury we have here. But be informed before entering the debate, there is no place now for ill-informed conjecture, mis-information, or flippancy, the window for investing decisions is closing and we would all be best to be fully informed enough to have our own views as to whether this is a place to put our money.
It's been a very long time and a lot of $ to get here, it is what the future holds now, not the past. Investors should only be interested in the future, and the risks, and whether that is worth their investment, now.
There's no doubt that there are risks with this venture, as there are with any mineral explorer, but it looks like you haven't actually researched this company or its prospects in any detail? Making statements that are inconsistent and frequently incorrect. As are others, so you are not alone.
Now you're winding up a Director and casting doubt on what has been published, but it's not clear from your statements now or in the past whether you've actually read anything, or any of it in detail.
Have you read the JORC? The assay's? The mine maps? The plan to production? The projections and assumptions? Anything? You seem to have joined the detractors making statements that all too often are quickly rebutted just by having read the announcements. Even your own recent argument shifts around, 1%, then 3%, like have you actually run the numbers yourself?
It's no wonder the Director gets a bit frustrated, but it's not just you, there is a lot of ill-informed off the cuff statements and opinions thrown around here that with just a modicum of reading and research are easily debunked.
This is not X.com soundbites from the ill-informed, this is a discussion group with unlimited space to talk it through. Informed discussion might be welcomed by other members here, whereas soundbites are probably not, especially if they are incorrect.
It should not be other posters or the Director who graciously posts here from time to time, who have to correct all this incorrect conjecture and mis information.
It is also not clear what motivates you or others (once bitten?) to be so skeptical when of all people, with your stated apparent experience, would know how to crunch the info and the numbers and draw an informed opinion, on whether this is investable. You probably do have a lot to contribute to our small community, but you choose to remain uninformed and snipe around the fringes. It's not clear why you continue to do this.
In any event, the CR terms are on the table. History will all be consigned to memory soon and whether or not the company raises the capital to continue their exploration into production remains to be seen.