Listened this morning to the Little interview in Morning Report ("Andrew Little on Labours year ahead"):
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/pr...9;s-year-ahead
And as the title promised - Andrew had little to say ... despite indulging in a tsunami of weasel words to avoid a clear answer on Labours stance on the TPPA. Ah well - he probably didn't had the time to read it yet ...
I was not sure whether I should feel more sorry for this inept politician or for the interviewer who, by trying to get a clear answer out of Little, had a more difficult time than if trying to nail some piece of custard against a wall.
Why does Labour choose to put somebody in leadership who can't talk, can't convince and can't even take a position?
Maybe they like to lose and punish themselves?
Given the sorry state of the Labour Leadership do I not think that National will need this time support to win the elections. They can save the money for CR (or whoever) and just play the Little interview often enough prior to the next elections in the media.
Or is this just the prelude to the next leadership gamble within the "little" old party? Little gone before the end of the year? But than - which other Labour PM would be brave enough to take over the leadership of a clearly sinking ship prior to the next elections?
Maybe we should rename this thread to "Any chance for the Left to win in 2020"?