Very astute there Joh and well pointed out. The gist of those quick comments Brent made that most may not have picked up, are significant.
Basically the building from here on does not involve the disruptive "smash `em down and rebuild new stuff in its place" along with all the ugly staff and occupancy inefficiencies that come with it.
Now the current and future developments are non village disruptive. As per the current example of the Lady Allum care suits being built along side the fully functioning existing village.
The future developments are far more "greenfield" in nature, OCA having finished building nearly all of the disruptive care suits , and are now out of the way. From here on associated financials are much easier to quantify. We are already seeing the staff cost / client ratio falling accordingly. Even OCA`s pipeline of small conversions involving a few care suits being built within older premises are almost complete (only about 40 more go where they used to do 50-60 per year)
The ratio of new cares suits to ILU building was 66/33 up until now, from here on its 50/50. (same as ARV going forward)
So from here OCA should be far easier to understand, staff costs ratio reducing and the high rewards from the apartments becoming more predominant.
While over the next 2 years the rocketing care suits resales will be the feature and drive profit growth, the real profit action gets cracking about 2023 when the new apartment sales , which are under construction now, start selling down....and then Beagles scenario about resales kicking in after that
......ohhhhhh, some one give me a beer to put these flames out !!!. (BTW, that's a top gun quote for you youngins)