If they get the issue underway in April then by May or June 16 they will be in a better position to judge how the economy is going, how their consumer and dairy loan books are performing, have some idea of the extent of provisioning for Fy16 in respect of same and the visibility on the dairy recovery, if any, should be better. Supreme court decision on MTF should be in by then too and due diligence done but I think MTF directors will play very, very hard to get and this could easily degenerate into a protracted Briscoes v Kathmandu situation. I'd imagine MTF directors like their comfortable position and directors fees just as much as Kathmandu directors do. Acting in best interests of shareholders or feathering their own nests ?