Originally Posted by
BlackPeter
And to be fair, this would not be appropriate either. If I look at the running total (12 month window), than they sold 654 units over the last 12 months which is above the median sales number for the last 10 quarters (642.5 units in a 12 months period).
Considering as well that the Q1 numbers normally appear to be lower (but for Q1-2017, which was exceptional) and that they said that they expect in the second half for more units to come for sale (they always do) do I not think that there is any reason to worry.
As long as Rymans 15% CAGR is seen as "best in class" can I live with SUM's backward CAGR of 20% (forward CAGR 17.7% - still better than Ryman);