Trevor got government financial assistance - probably thought he should support stores who did likewise
Printable View
its news relevant to hlg so i can post it , if you dont like it too bad dont read it.
I am get a bit tired of the speech police on this site telling me what i cant and cannot post on a thread if they do not like it esp the ones who see posts as a negative on there one way ramp.
No sweat, Gwd - bull... is obviously short, caught or missed out and has run out of ideas of how to ramp the sp down to suit his purpose.
Simple solution - he goes on ignore and I suggest everyone who has enough of his garbage do the same. No point reading repetitive garbage which no value.
i am very surprised by the lack of understanding by people on this site and esp this thread on how such things if they gain momentum can effect a brand. it is obvious the pay-back of the subsidy is gaining momentum and companies that do- not may be effected. for me being short i am not but maybe i am a activist share holder for all you know.
anyway ive had enough of this thread i leave it to the less knowledgable to keep ramping there short term agenda
Hmmmm we are in the age of the 'cancel culture'. Last thing we would need is 'instagram models' posting selfies with #boycottGlassons or #boycottHallenstiens. It's something I've been thinking about...
However, having talked to some friends whom are very 'woke' last week, it is clear this issue just isn't that cool or hip. So little risk of customers voting with their feet and shopping elsewhere it seems.
Retail has been booming whilst people have been unable to spend money on international travel, I wonder if this level of spending will continue when we are able to travel again?
It was a WAGES subsidy bull dont you realize... not a company subsidy. The govt made it very clear the money was to be paid to employees and that they should be paid 80 percent of their pay. WHS went even further and paid the full salary. If the companies that took the subsidy went and paid other overheads with the money or didn't pay employees at all then pay the money back. If the money was paid to staff then how possibly can the company repay that back. It would be the staff who have the money now butbit would be ridiculous for the govt to ask them for it back. I suppose you would disagree lol
Think I can see why ‘it’s a thing’ .....good stuff and some prices look pretty cheap.
Just a bit of competition - no worries
https://nz.shein.com/?url_from=nzgoo...xoCSxAQAvD_BwE