That's why I'm not adding and why I say FY22. However it can all change anytime with the right announcement.
Printable View
I'm a bit slow today but why the "...in the US with a non US company..." specifically?
I actually find this company extremely strange and a weird hold now.
Last time they became "standardized" it didn't really translate to much, but I guess we'll see.
Does anyone know if the meeting was recorded?
I've had a search but unable to find a link.
Thanks in advance.
Some good news for holders....... see here.
+ IKE has signed one of U.S.A.’s largest utilities companies to the IKE Analyze platform, to help assess and design power pole infrastructure in a fast, safe, and reliable way.
+ IKE will initially assist with 250,000 assets, a small subset of approximately 10 million assets across the customer’s asset base.
+ The initial phase is expected generate approximately $750,000 revenue in IKE’s FY21 (the period ending 31 March).
+ The customer’s parent company is an American Fortune 100 energy business with many similar companies in its portfolio.
Is that the first time they've reported the number of "assets" in a contract announcement? $3 per asset for 6 months? $6p.a...get all 10mil.
Only top 100 Fortune energy utility business is Exelon: https://www.exeloncorp.com/company/about-exelon