Originally Posted by
Baa_Baa
I didn't say it was the 'court of appeals' either, can you not read? And it has nothing, at all, to do with your fabricated definition of 'appeal'. Why do you just dig your hole deeper and not acknowledge something simple that you used the word 'appeal', when you meant 'repeal'. So obstinate, I don't get it.
Most people who replied, starting with Fungus Pudding, called you out on the word 'appeal', but you didn't get it apparently. Then you dug your hole deeper, eventually trying to wriggle out of it by saying "anyway, it's just semantics", when it's not, you were just wrong, plain and simple.
Admit it.