But if they win they are going to scrap recognising depreciation as an expense - for that reason alone (abscense of logical reasoning) I will not vote for National.
Printable View
Absence either. Sorry, it's rare to catch the grammar police with silly spelling mistakes. Remember that politics is 1. gain power, 2. retain power. That means, what they say they will do is not necessarily what they will do. Applies to all of them, this is the 'gain power' stage. Say whatever they think is sufficient to win the election. Do whatever they want after they've won.
I didn't say that a party has to align 100% - obviously none do, which I imagine is true for most voters. But not allowing landlords to depreciate their buildings is grossly unfair and illogical. There is simply no justification for it. What next - disallow taxi drivers to depreciate their vehicles? Stop engineers depreciating their machinery?
Sounds like ‘the toothy one’ and her successor, the ventriloquist’s dummy: talk a load of hot air about “”let’s do this!” and then deliver nothing except a concealed ‘co-governance’ agenda (‘delivering for maori’) - all while borrowing & spending with reckless abandon.
‘Abandon’ is, of course, a key word here. The ventriloquist's dummy has abandoned Labours Ardernian waffle about ‘be(ing) kind’ and is now unmasked as a really nasty little piece of work. Recent stand-ups high-light his two ‘dead shark’ eyes and taut mouth as he spits petulant venom at his opponents, while his lackeys in the CTU serve up a campaign of nasty attack ads. From faux ‘spread your legs’ bonhomie to the depths of gutter politics: pressure has a way of revealing the true nature of people.
Is he as bad as Sam Uffindel (who Lux reckons is a good bloke).