It appears Luxon & Bishop aren't on the same page.
Whoops, more tea vicar?
https://www.interest.co.nz/property/...use-prices-not
Printable View
It appears Luxon & Bishop aren't on the same page.
Whoops, more tea vicar?
https://www.interest.co.nz/property/...use-prices-not
"Ever wondered who or what is constantly trying to block the new government’s policies? Why is it that announcements by ministers about the economy, educational changes, new health proposals, reducing the runaway numbers of public servants and combating juvenile crime, are quickly met with so-called leaked bits of advice about how the new ideas have been “tried before and don’t work”?
Leading to cocky assertions from the Labour Opposition that the media then highlight. Frequently, the minister is the last person allowed media space."
Well, read on ....
https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/...-this-ministry
What are we doing here with the Tax on Internet Companies on News content jumble that squawking & raving Willie (of failed Govt Broadcasting Disasters acclaim) was aiming to bring in ? ;)
Time that Nat/NZF/ACT booted this one back out the door where it came from onto the pile of hopeless Labour initiatives for the next bombfire ;)
Do we really want this sort of Media rescue job happening ?
Maori separatism in perspective.
As dumb as it gets from a back to the Stone Age group of Maori minority - encouraged on by Ardern & the Maori cabal.
https://breakingviewsnz.blogspot.com...dise-lost.html
So the author makes fake claims about what Maori are saying and then goes on to tell us how they should be grateful for being colonized.
Makes spurious claims of previous civilizations that have been dismissed by any historian with credibility.
No mention of the diseases that the Europeans carried with them that decimated the Maori population, no mention of the land confiscations, no mention of the killings either.
Maori, like any race weren't perfect, they were warlike in some areas and hunted and enslaved etc, much like the Western world.
Some Maori, some, might be trying to rewrite history, but that's no excuse for this garbage.
I always thought you were a racist and promoting this sort of tripe just proves it.
So typical of National - trying to maintain the status quo as much as possible rather than take the Bull by the horn and sort things out once and for all.
Thank goodness ACT & NZF are there to put steel into the Coslition’s spine.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/psa-cr...BF6MJDEELTWJI/
The racist criminal who attacked the 16 year old school boy has been arrested for hate-motivated crime.
Anyone with common sense and common decency would have figured out that the school boy & the 75 year old Samaritan were speaking the truth. They had no reason to lie - unlike the Union, AT and the other arseholes who chose to not believe the victim.
But no, there are those who chose (like the arsehole Bjauck) to dispute the victim's account and who actually think it is okay for the bus driver to do nothing before, during and after the assault.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/crime/...BCCB3SKK5VCXY/
"Police have arrested a 39-year-old woman after the attack on a schoolboy with a metal rod on an Auckland bus.
Acting detective senior sergeant James Mapp said police located and arrested the woman this morning in relation to the assault on a bus in Pakuranga last month.
A 39-year-old woman will appear in Manukau District Court tomorrow charged with wounding with intent to wound.
Mapp said police will allege this was a hate-motivated crime."
Arresting this vicious criminal, provided it is the right person, in no way changes my condemnation of knee jerk responses towards the driver, where the full details from the circumstances, the driver’s and other witnesses’ testimony have not been examined. You seemed only too keen to make a snap judgment on the driver’s response based on social media posts of witnesses.
Perhaps you are more accustomed to a system that is inquisitorial and does not incorporate natural justice?
Your repetitious vulgarity here, and towards other posters, is disgusting.
You are not getting away so easily, Bjauck, from your sanctimonious and reprehensible mindset which preferred to stand in the way of the victim and the public getting proper recognition of the harm done to the school kid and the potential danger out there from the attacker, and the inaction of the arsehole busdriver.
Anyone with their eyes fully open can see that the bus driver, his Union and AT stand accused and have no defence because the traumatised victim and the Samaritan have spoken the truth which the arsehole bus driver cannot refute.
The accusation of the bus driver doing nothing before, during and after the attack has been made openly from a school kid. You tried your deflection BS by citing libel law but the school boy & the brave samaritan HAVE already MADE the accusation about the arsehole bus driver - so why has the arseholes bus driver & Union not refute so they can sue them?
The answer is simple - because they spoke the truth.
There is nothing but deafening silence, deflection and unwarranted belligerent attack on the need for a proper inquiry called by Simeon Brown by the Union. Notice there’s no denial or refutation by the Union of the accusation?
We choose to stand with the traumatised 16 year old school boy and the 75 year old brave Samaritan. You chose to stand with the arsehole bus driver. Your choice and decision.