Yes and whats the bet the sellers at .59 are missing come Monday.
Printable View
Proof? Evidence? Circumstantial evidence?
Could it be that you are confusing amateur investors making optimistic assumptions with professionals trying to sound like amateurs? Just don't like where you are heading with this.
As far as I know, this websites purpose is for investors to share ideas about investing in particular shares or shares in general. Your contribution DJAB appears to be rubbishing everyone else without offering any advice yourself. Looking at your history so far you have simply stated that Xero was a bubble (duh) and that this stock is overpriced, without telling us your analysis. If you want to rubbish people/stocks/shares without offering your analysis as to why, you can expect a ribbing IMHO.
You clearly need to do some actual research into this stock and back your statements up with facts. The current market cap of the company is just over 1 times larger than expected revenue per year in 4-5 years time.
You've come onto this forum and bagged some of the most respected posters, poster who you could learn hell of a lot from. You are also yet to actually contribute anything useful to this forum. Can you please just leave the forum so that the rest of us who actually want intelligent discussions and debate can learn things from each other. I'm sure I'm not the only one who would rather not have to spend my time wading through your rubbish.
I don't think there is anyone on this forum who wants to read your posts and I'm even more confident that there is no one that would use your posts as part of their research etc. So why bother posting? No one wants you here :)
(That's my last post on the issue, lets get back to PEB)
The point of posting DJAB, as is the point of this website, is to provide informed or educated information and debate on shares. As you are providing neither, why do you want to post on here?
I could say "DJAB is a little girl who likes to dress in pink skirts and sing songs to fairies", but it would be neither relevant or helpful and is outside the obvious context of this website. Just as are your posts are apparently irrelevant, I still require actually reading who posted it in order to ignore it or skimming the content to filter the information. As this wastes everyones time, you will notice other members try to not do it. If you don't have something relevant to say, why waste everyones time? Or is your intention to come onto a website just to bag everyone elses analysis? That is what is called "trolling" in internet terms, I suggest you look it up.
Blobles you can not analyse pie in the sky. You can only make an estimate & pray or believe in the greater fool theory. DJAB is as entitled to his opinion as you are yours. Which is hope & pray. I can see no certanties in any of your Facts or figures of the future of PEB.
But Possum ... if I write something like .... 'PEB has closed at 0.58 at it will now get smashed from here'. Where is the justification for my crystal ball gazing? I do not really want to spend my time reading what someone thinks without some sense of reasoning. Otherwise we would get every clown (no offence, Sparky 9-) saying a stock will go in XY direction.
The only thing I get from the gentleman's posts is amusement that he actually thinks he is intelligent.
Absolutely and I encourage you to state just that. As far as I recall, I have just estimated the size of the market CxBladder is entering, the potential for the stock to do well based on their product being better than the rest. While at times I am optimistic, it is metered by other peoples pessimism. As far as I am concerned, it is fine to discuss potentials, there is no other way to do it with a company that is just starting to sell its product. It is also fine to discuss hurdles and downsides, no problem at all.
However, if I went onto every thread and said "this stock is rubbish, selling for much more than its worth", would that be at all useful without providing some level of justification? No, it would not, and I think you will agree that it is not worth posting. That is simply all that is being posted by DJAB and it is not useful. We ask DJAB to provide further information as to why he believes so and he simply posts back that he doesn't have to and he has every right to post on anything he wants. Again, IS THAT USEFUL?
Actually, that's a good point Hancocks, does anyone know how new medical devices are advertised in America? Are free samples given? Or seminars asking doctors to attend? Or lobbying hospital distributors to push the product? Understanding how it works may give us some insight as to where to look for how successful/unsuccessful Cxbladder is...
Share goes up, share goes down - that's the market, one day to the next, one week to the other.
Some like it just like that - and why not, volatility equates trading opportunities.
The year by year trend though is the real measure of how a stock is trending and for those of us who rode the ups and downs with the likes of Diligent, just another day in the office - no need to get too worked up.
:D :D
There are 2 sides to every coin guys.
Sometimes those that seem to be slagging are really just hoping to be able to buy in at a more affordable price which is fair enough.
If thats the case it still shows interest in the company,its just a matter of value.
He didnt really say the co. was rubbish ,just that in his opinion it was over valued and lets face it ,no one really knows at this stage.
All we can say for certain is that it is in a volatile phase.
Most would agree its a good product-its really a matter of how well its marketed and how quickly it is accepted-ie. the rate of growth-and of course the outside market in general.
To me,most of the time these big falls and big rises are a bit of a mystery but having not acted on the last fall around 53 a few weeks back I certainly would welcome the opportunity to have another go.
My guess is that eventually the volatility will subside and it will settle into slow steady growth
You had all this Hype over Bliss & other biotech Products companies listed on the ASX or NZX over the last 20years how many are still listed or even in existence now. Let alone made a profit. You might as well buy an expensive bottle of Champagne & drink it. At least that way you have about an hours or so pleasure for your money. Rather than six months of dreaming of extreme wealth. The only other thing is if you believe in the greater fool theory. You find a greater fool to buy them off you. What is the success ratio for biotech companies as high as 1 in 200 or as low as 1 in 2000.
I thought that Ramping on this share site became rare when the two great rampers G STOLWYK & THE KING died. But it seems to have raised its head again. Surely we do not want this share site to become another HOT COPPER
Understanding that of all the companies I invest in do carry inherent risk and accepting that some of them will not exist in a few years time, is fine with me. My willingness to accept this high level of risk is reduced somewhat by the research I perform on the companies and the sectors they are developing in.
All investors have their own levels of risk and if they consider purchasing a particular company's stock carries the same likely outcome as enjoying a nice Moet, then maybe said investor should be investing in Telecom, Ryman or whatever blue chip their risk tolerance allows.
I am comfortable with holding stock in PEB, or XRO for that matter, and look more positively, whilst acknowledging the risk, at thinking 'What if they do deliver on their Big Hairy Audacious Goal'
Sorry guys, this site must only be for professional and highly experienced traders such as yourselves, I will stop posting and only read your amazing and insightful posts. Signing off...
Sparky The Clown But the repetition of the same few facts over an over again. And the abuse of anybody that queries those facts will be substantiated in time gets abused. What is the success versus failure rate of biotechs. This the supportive posters do not want to here about. You are one of the few reasonably neutral on PEB in saying it is a very high risk investment. Others keep pushing every little fact that supports there thinking. The repetition of the same few facts over & over again is sickening. And saying that anybody that mentions a negative is jealous that they did not get in as low as the poster. It gives the impression some posters think this is Gods gift to share investors
Who is asking you to read all the posts on this thread?
Do what most of us do - pick out the posters who provide good information and analysis.
Learn to differentiate between those who 'ramp' and those who inform.
Learn to teach those who are here to learn, and those who are here to cause mischief.
Life is too short to get too serious about most things - except when we are talking about crooks (finance companies, Plus SMS), incompetence (Rakon, Telecom, NZOG etc) or blatant hypocrisy (Credit Sails, PGC etc).