I'm not sure who it is yet. I figured Vince was going after JT for his defamation.
Printable View
I think it is bullish
To clarify for all members the user profile in question was 'Bullish' which was being used by a member of NTL.
Furthermore, all members should disregard anything which was posted by the member "Bullish".
Do the board of NTL know who it is ?
What does that tell you about JT's stability? :D
I've crossed swords with JT a few times over the years, usually in a civil and often tongue in cheek manner, and usually on the political threads where his beloved is currently taking a hammering. I'm pretty sure his recent rant is a reflection of that. It certainly was defamatory and am awaiting Vince to take action.
Bullish PM'd me last night. He wasn't rude or anything, but wanted to know "what Hill had done to me" for me to have such a dislike towards him.
Bullish had his account set up so he/she could PM out but could not receive messages back. Pity really because he/she never got a chance to read my reply. :D :D :D
I've just reported this post to Vince for Moderation. I assumed this was what he was looking into earlier today. I consider it defamatory and vindictive. I take it from this post that Joshuatree saw it as his job to destroy confidence in a listed company and feels it is ok to defame people as he does so.
Bullish started posting on about page 2 of this thread. He (and I say that is a he because I am old enough to recognise and admit that men write differently to women) seems to be very well informed.
Hey Jonu, I admire your enthusiasm and support your posts on almost all other things, but getting worked up about JT here on NTL isn't helping your cause. He uses inflammatory rhetoric to wind you up, it could be fairly said NTL are serial liars because time and time again what they say they will do isn't what they actually do, or achieve. Alternatively though you could say they are optimistic, perhaps overly so and unintentionally mislead investors. Depends on your perspective.
I don't see what JT said as being defamatory, but not being a legal mind I wouldn't know the in's and out's of it. What you might need to get used to is that NTL have misled investors for decades 'it's a proven goldmine and profit is just around the corner'. Well that may be the case but the fact is that they have huge hurdles still to overcome to get to realistic commercial production. Massive hurdles, some are potentially show stoppers.
There's really very little evidence that this is a good investment right now, some might say no evidence. Serially they underperform, over promise and fail to deliver. Imo you won't see any commercially viable gold quantity coming out of this mine for a long time, if ever. Just compare it to Aus explorers and you'll see how inept this management is at converting possible and probable ... to mined and sold ore.
Just saying. No need to shaft the doubters, they have decades of reality to refer to. They are also correct that unbelievably NTL have managed to secure vast millions of $ to sustain their exploration, diluted shareholders into oblivion, pay their staff outrageous salaries (no way they can justify the CEO salary, for example, come on!), and deliver pretty much nothing except promises which have never been delivered upon.
Sorry to run against you Jonu, I do genuinely like and read what you have to say elsewhere, but I think this company really is a flea ridden dog and when it isn't, or if it ever isn't, a simple price chart will flag a buy-in. No need to suffer however long the opportunity costs of holding a mutt with no evidence of ever getting a ROI.
To avoid all confusion... no other employee's of NTL are being suspected of being the user "Bullish"
I can confirm it was the current C.E.O of NTL that was in fact the user Bullish and another couple of usernames which have been banned previously.