There must be more to the planning staff objections to a SHA, as reported in the media. For example, these 'objections' look vague and I have to wonder if the planners tried to find a way to make it work, rather than ways to stop it. There does appear to be strong demand. I get that they have to say if the development meets the rules or not, but I hope they also offered solutions and not just problems.
The application for Saxton did not meet the Nelson City Housing Accord, did not align with the district plan and it was unknown whether the developer would be able to provide required storm water, water and transport infrastructure, however it was found the area could support the development. Other comments made to the councillors surrounded flood hazards due to a farm dam upstream and incomplete work on the Saxton Creek upgrade.
Then there was Councillor Mike Ward with an objection that the development should be near the shops.