Originally Posted by
Daytr
I said rhetoric not policies, ACT have more extreme policies imo, but here are a few extreme issues relating to NZF.
Siding with the tobacco companies & not even campaigning on it. One of the first pieces of legislation to go through. Crickey that must have been a big payback.
Another is Shane Jones complete disregard for the environment. I'm all for cutting red tape where it makes sense, but this guy is a dinosaur. As I said, there is a balance to be had not extreme policy or rhetoric for that matter.
Both Peters & Jones are unnecessarily antagonistic. Luxon should have had the balls and called another election and said to the electorate, give me a mandate without Peters.
He probably would have swung my vote & I reckon a few like me.