You want to point us to posts where people said they know the outcome - or are you just grandstanding? I remember only posts pointing out a material risk for Synlait to lose ... and hey, what a risk it was ...
Synlait management was gambling shareholder funds with very high stakes. District court saying heads and High court saying tails indicated already that the legal situation is deeply uncertain. It was only Synlait management who choose to rely on the coin in the Supreme Court to fall into the right place and they did bet several hundred million of shareholder funds on that.
The fact that they have been this time lucky in the Supreme Court does not prove that they acted in a careful manner - well, not more than a drink driver managing to avoid an accident would be evidence that drink driving is safe.