Anyone care to explain this for me. Struggling to make sense of the South Island Farm Holdings arrangements: http://www.stuff.co.nz/timaru-herald...l-70m-in-limbo
Printable View
Anyone care to explain this for me. Struggling to make sense of the South Island Farm Holdings arrangements: http://www.stuff.co.nz/timaru-herald...l-70m-in-limbo
Even the NBR is part of the chorus demanding that Feeley should go:
http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/nbr-edi...must-go-102035
Of course "the end justifies the means" brigade cannot see any form of issue ... I wonder how many charges under the crimes act Feeley will face? Theft as a servant ... ?
Works for me ... charge him under the crimes act and give him 10 minutes of home detention.
Then ask yourself: is this the standard you expect for the head of the SFO? Does this ugly gloating build public confidence that the SFO is impartial? Do you believe the public wants to see the humiliation of Allan Hubbard to proceed beyond his death? It is clear that the SFO does not respect the law of the land and the presumpion of innocence in "due process".
The SFO, in its current state, cannot claim the moral right to investigate serious fraud on behalf of the NZ government.
Who in the right mind wants the SFO to be impartial when prima facie, fraud has been established?
The SFO must go, hammer and tong, after that to bring to trial - the court will decide guilt or not.
You seem to think that the SFO is investigator, prosecutor, judge, jury and executioner?
You actually concede my point with your reference to "prima facie" - what you probably mean is "res ipsa loquitur".
However, even if this is what you mean, I doubt you would get anyone of any significance defending your point of view. You are advocating a lynch mob mentality.
... and anyone else Adam Feeley imagines have committed fraud ...
... and exempting those Adam Feeley imagines haven't committted fraud, but actually have ...
... and anyone who pissed Adam Feeley off and he can charge with fraud, becuase he can ...