Yes it is just the number of shares and hence the % that are incorrect.
Congratulations on having the guts to be in the top 13 Gmatt
Printable View
Flashback...
"MINE: NTL: Traffic Management Plan Approved
13th April 2016
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED"
Wonder if they're any further with this a FULL YEAR later???
Someone is slowly accumulating, depth on 0.5 is constantly getting reloaded.
I think we are at the point where a concerted barrage of questions from frustrated shareholders needs to be directed to management. A year on from agreement in principle is unacceptable. If the District Council is to blame, let it be known, if not pull finger and be up front with your long suffering shareholders.
Is there support for this stance?
Benjamin Graham wrote “Ever since 1934 we have argued in our writings for a more intelligent and energetic attitude by stockholders toward their managements”
I sold out after I stopped believing in the story and the management. They used the uptick in interest around AMER and Rahu to raise a good amount of money and now the information flow has dried up. As soon as I believed they weren't going to keep their 6 month timeframe to extract ore my opinion changed.
The mistake I made was initially believing the bulk sampling was "fully consented". The 12 month delay in the TMP has shown that I was incorrect in my analysis. Luckily I exited with no damage done. Unfortunately I think at this point in time NTL is hamstrung as if they don't have access nothing else really matters.
The next quarterly is going to be very interesting!!
Jonu... I support your stance but I no longer hold so the Directors won't be too interested in my opinion haha
Have any of the new Directors purchased any shares??? That may be a big clue as to whether this project goes ahead