You get more rump per KG of Cow than you do Eye Fillet. So I would say its less emissions for Rump and more for eye fillet?
Printable View
You get more rump per KG of Cow than you do Eye Fillet. So I would say its less emissions for Rump and more for eye fillet?
New man steps in next week ...things will start looking up
Hope Babidge doesn’t hang around too long .....been bad with him as caretaker .....and I hope he doesn’t get any incentive payments (contract said he could possibly earn $0.6m annually in incentives. Talk about Hrdlicka being in the trough ...Babidge maybe one as well.
First thing he will do is open up the cupboards and find all the skeletons pertaining to the double downgrades.
As for Hrdlicka, remember there was a disagreement over strategy - she wanted to accelerate marketing & promotional spend (short term pain) to offset the over-reliance on the Daigou channel?
Well madmat and kiora, apparently you are both wrong:
".... Some studies provide the carbon
footprint of beef in terms of the finished carcass, whereas others provide data for
individual cuts of beef. The carbon footprint of a whole beef carcass is generally
apportioned to cuts of meat based on an economic allocation; whereby the more
valuable cuts (e.g. sirloin) receive the largest allocation per kg than less valuable cuts
(e.g. mince)."
So, does eating eye fillet produce more emissions than driving from Denmark to Paris? The devil is in the detail and it is probably a meaningless comparison.
Sheesh this thread is often guilty of going off track, but we have gone to the next level now :lol:
its getting hammered today , must be the all that chat on emissions from steak causing people to worry over how many cows NZ will end up with once ardern and shaw BBQ a few