Originally Posted by
Harrie
Yeah thats right psychic, the same could have been said about a2 milk when scientists were saying there was no evidence to support the proposition that there was any difference in a2 milk compared with standard a2/a1 milk proteins. I'm not even sure if they have ever proved it, but what we do know is that only cows milk produce a1/a2 milk protein, and all other animals including humans only the a2 milk protein. This case is different however because there is scientific evidence available to prove the efficacy of Cxbladder. It does not make sense to support the use of a cystoscopy in all cases when someone presents with blood in the urine when only 5% have actual bladder or urethral cancer. With a well documented high 90's NPV why would you want to have a cystoscopy? There is obviously vested interests at play here. Notice the rhetoric changing though...now its "high quality" evidence. next review will be CXbladder incorrectly missed one without saying how many were missed with a cystoscopy, or some other BS reason to prevent it becoming mainstream. That might work in the short term.