Sad news.
I noticed on wednesday there was a Hubbard supporters sign in a paddock at about the place where the accident occured.
I just think how different things would have turned out if he had sold out ten years ago.
Printable View
Sad news.
I noticed on wednesday there was a Hubbard supporters sign in a paddock at about the place where the accident occured.
I just think how different things would have turned out if he had sold out ten years ago.
I think you are right Percy, the sign is very close to where the accident must have been.
Very sad news and condolences to their family.
Tragic news for Mrs Hubbard and the family. Events have further conspired against the Hubbards to clear their good name - I am deeply saddened by this.
David Hillary has posted a reflective view of the life and times of Allan Hubbard on his biog.
http://www.lostsoulblog.com/
Boop boop de do
Marilyn Munroe
I read the Hillary "eulogy" for Mr Hubbard.
Hillary grapples with his own ontological dilemmas as he tries to say something about Mr Hubbard's life. After much rambling about ... he arrives at the conclusion that he doesn't know.
Not much of a "eulogy" - just another dimension of David Hillary "vanity".
Where Hillary sees nothing that does not confuse him, in the life of Allan Hubbard - I see a profound simplicity. Mr Hubbard made money the "servant" in his relationships with people; not the "master". While Mr Hubbard was clearly deeply religious; this obviously motivated his desire to do good. However, his core values transcend religion - he simply applied these core values completely and logically, in his life. Perhaps it is a generational thing - if you lived through a depression and a few wars; you may view the people in your community differently from those who have only known an affluent NZ society.
Anyone care to explain this for me. Struggling to make sense of the South Island Farm Holdings arrangements: http://www.stuff.co.nz/timaru-herald...l-70m-in-limbo
Even the NBR is part of the chorus demanding that Feeley should go:
http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/nbr-edi...must-go-102035
Of course "the end justifies the means" brigade cannot see any form of issue ... I wonder how many charges under the crimes act Feeley will face? Theft as a servant ... ?
Works for me ... charge him under the crimes act and give him 10 minutes of home detention.
Then ask yourself: is this the standard you expect for the head of the SFO? Does this ugly gloating build public confidence that the SFO is impartial? Do you believe the public wants to see the humiliation of Allan Hubbard to proceed beyond his death? It is clear that the SFO does not respect the law of the land and the presumpion of innocence in "due process".
The SFO, in its current state, cannot claim the moral right to investigate serious fraud on behalf of the NZ government.
Who in the right mind wants the SFO to be impartial when prima facie, fraud has been established?
The SFO must go, hammer and tong, after that to bring to trial - the court will decide guilt or not.
You seem to think that the SFO is investigator, prosecutor, judge, jury and executioner?
You actually concede my point with your reference to "prima facie" - what you probably mean is "res ipsa loquitur".
However, even if this is what you mean, I doubt you would get anyone of any significance defending your point of view. You are advocating a lynch mob mentality.
... and anyone else Adam Feeley imagines have committed fraud ...
... and exempting those Adam Feeley imagines haven't committted fraud, but actually have ...
... and anyone who pissed Adam Feeley off and he can charge with fraud, becuase he can ...