Oca should grow faster than sum initially because theyre currently cheap
Printable View
Oca should grow faster than sum initially because theyre currently cheap
Recent research I have seen shows.;
…………………………………………...RYM...………………………….SUM...…………………… …….OCA
NTA...………………………………….$3.88...………………………..$3.48...……… ………………$1.04
P/NTA...………………………………….3.2...……………………………2.2...………………… ……...1.1
Thanks Percy & thestg
Wow this is interesting, which is the cheapest now/looking forward?
Correct me if wrong, but think I read OCA's existing 50 sites have significantly lower unit density coverage per site than SUM or RYM, meaning OCA has the potential to increase/double the number of units without the need to find & purchase more land.
Got to be a good thing?
Just a reminder of the numbers, by 2036, projected there will be 1.258,500 million NZ'ers over the age of 65, that's an additional 547,300 or 77% increase from 2016. 1 in 4.5 NZ'ers will be over 65.
(Source: NZ SuperSeniors website)
That's one huge headache for govt policy planners.