Hi blackcap,
No, that is incorrect when it comes to a Scheme of Arrangement. The rules for a SoA are very clear.
Under a SoA, if OGOG get 75% of the minority shares to vote in favour then they will acquire all of the shares (regardless of whether you personally voted AGAINST). Hence why it is so important to get as many AGAINST votes as possible - because this scheme really is 'all or nothing' for OGOG.
If they get the 75%, there is an opportunity to go to court at the end of October. I stand to be corrected, but it is my understanding that the courts are only interested in making sure that the SoA process has been carried out correctly, and that there is nothing obviously wrong with the offer. This is not an avenue that I think is likely to create much success for minority holders (though I admit I have no expertise in this area), hence my focus on making sure enough votes materialise to block the deal and avoid the whole situation.
Hope this helps.