Then you would have to think "we are well positioned."
Printable View
I spoke to Stu a couple of weeks ago when I bought a small parcel from him (that 40,000 sale, just dipping my toe in the water) and he discussed his interest in increasing the number of individual shareholders.
Interesting. I think there is a minimum shareholder number requirement for the NZAX/NZX.
And a quick googe reveals you need at least 50 members of the public: https://www.nzx.com/files/static/NZA...ules_Final.pdf who I think are people who own less than 10%.
404 lines but that is certificate numbers, not shareholder numbers - there are a lot of duplicate lines. Will probably still be over 50 but better to be over by a margin.
Edit: a bit of excel magic turning the pdf into a spreadsheet shows there are 193 shareholders on that list. My magic skills aren't that great so I may be wrong.
Wondered where you got to.?
Board meeting this Friday as you noted.Should be something on their site www.estaronline.com late afternoon.
Either Unlisted or NZAX.[I hope NZAX].Don't see an IPO.Just transfer across ,as they don't need to raise capital..CJ's list looks good.Divie? I certainly hope so.
Will we see you at the AGM on Friday 2nd August.?
I turned down SLI to buy more Estaronline.!!!! We will see?
Think you could say,"we are well positioned."
Yes, Unlisted board wouldn't make a lot of sense if we want to up our profile. An IPO in the present environment would probably achieve that to a greater extent but, generating profits as we are, we probably don't need more capital and dilution is always a pain.
Keeping my fingers crossed too for another dividend.
In terms of my own profile in this and other forums, I love to listen to what others have to say but resist getting too involved with giving my opinions. I can be very forthright and this can result in endless conversations that often go nowhere.
Hope to make it to the AGM but at this stage it appears I may have another commitment.
All the best.