Davidson will hang onto her position until the day she dies.
If Chloe becomes a real threat, watch the knives come out.
Printable View
Genter now has an electorate seat. She will have another crack. She has already tried to roll Shaw, cos according to her it's OK for two people with vaginas to head the party, just not two people with penises. But then they have to squeeze in a brown person with or without a vagina. Complicated ay?
I saw a very animated, happy woman excited to have retained her seat and thrilled that the Greens had won two other seats. When you say she was angry you are projecting your own anger on to her, in my opinion, and it seems that you are not the only one to feel upset about the white male being apparently sidelined by women.
If two parties sign a contract, it is not possible for one of the signatories afterwards to just run a referendum whether they want to stick with their commitments, or whether they prefer to wiggle out - isn't it? Your understanding of law and order is sorely lacking.
I understand as well that even Chris Luxon is bright enough to understand this simple legal fact (pacta sunt servanda) and therefore does not agree to a referendum. Does not make any sense and would have no legal relevance at all. Looks like populist ACT has limited brainpower (as all populists do) - and clearly, your post only demonstrates your absolute lack of legal grasp.
Clearly - if the interpretation of a contract is in dispute, than you don't have a referendum, but you ask lawyers and courts to sort that out. Stupid.
Sad that your only method to cover up for your incredible ignorance seems to be to launch personal attacks on other posters. Quite disgraceful behaviour.
Quite stupid post.
Brexit was a vote to ask the people whether they want to exit a contract which had an exit clause. While it was absolutely braindead to do so, I don't see any legal challenges in doing that.
Correct me if I am wrong, but the Treaty of Waitangi has to the best of my knowledge no exit clause. If it would have - would this mean all Pakeha (living here based on the treaty) would need to leave NZ immediately after cancelling the contract?
Better use next time the grey matter between your ears if you need to think :) ;
If the two signatories can't agree on what the Treaty/Tiriti (there's a hint right there) means it will be considered null and void. There's your exit clause. Racist extremists in the Greens, TPM and Labour have set up this situation. Now they will reap their harvest.
The radical new interpretations being sold to us of the Treaty's meaning don't make any sense when you consider who wrote it. Whether Maori understood what they were signing is another matter.