Originally Posted by
Rawz
that's a really interesting chart- i would have thoughts HGH would have outperformed much much higher.
As a shareholder for the majority of the time you are sitting in the red vs NZX50. Then only the last year or so you pass it and make a 10% better return.. Is that sufficient for the extra risk over 5 years?
now that extra risk is here in spades with the aussie expansion. Would want a higher premium than 10% over the next 5 years.
Maybe $1.55 is fair? what was that based on again? P/E or NTA ratio?