Hi Snoopy
I won't try to debate every point you raise, many of which simply demonstrate rather different points of view on what ATM is about. But a couple of points:
No I don't think there are no vested interests there, but it's a huge and diverse market and a2 milk is not going to be a threat, just another consumer option. It may pose a bit of a challenge to soy, almond etc because it will be saying you may not need to switch to faux milk when there's a real milk that avoids some of the problems of apparent lactose intolerance for some consumers. But what are they going to do - close a2 down? Not when the science is so clear in favour of a2.
As for the threat from Buffalo Milk: if buffalo could be farmed economically as a competitor for cow's milk, I suspect we'd already be hearing about it. And ATM does not try to use its IP monopoly to stop people having a2 cows, a part of nature. It just says in effect that you can't market your milk as a2 unless you can prove it's a2, and the only way you can do that is by using our DNA test.
You say that ATM "have given up on profits! They are reinvesting all their positive cashflow into developing new markets". Lots of companies forego dividend payments in their early stages to reinvest in expansion. That doesn't mean they've given up on profits.