Two reasons why it might be the favoured option :
A) Non-residents can't vote.
B) Progressive tax advocates can be happy that it may eventually "be expanded" one day. It will set the stage for further reforms.
Printable View
Two reasons why it might be the favoured option :
A) Non-residents can't vote.
B) Progressive tax advocates can be happy that it may eventually "be expanded" one day. It will set the stage for further reforms.
The toxic rhetoric on this thread is pretty off putting. Why not the one upmanship & ego at the door. I used to see a lot of the same BS in my banking days but generally the more successful, or mature at least, didn't bother with that sort of childish behavior.
Posters should be able to put out ideas or thoughts without being mocked. Sure challenge what they say as that's what we are here for, robust but friendly debate.
I would suggest quite a few don't bother interacting due to the behavior exhibited.
I agree. At best it’s a dick measuring contest. At worst it’s vitriolic and negative personal attacks. I try to skip posts of the worst offenders which is a shame because they would have interesting and informative posts if they weren’t being the worst of forum members
The fuel tax subsidy which has helped New Zealanders ease their costs at the petrol pump for almost a year will end in June, the Minister of Finance has confirmed
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/grant-...s%20confirmed.