Originally Posted by
Alan3285
There is no statement in the SM Report that Aorangi made an offer to the public. As I said above, that doesn't mean there wasn't, but your statements are astoundingly biased in one direction with no apparent 'balance' whatsoever.
You seem to be willing to convict AH before any definitive evidence is actually presented.
I don't know for certain whether he is or is not guilty, but I do know that I believe in the rule of law, whereas your posts support 'kangaroo courts' and summary judgement.
If he is guilty, then why are you so scared of due process? If he is guilty, then he will be convicted and rightly so.
However, if he is not guilty, then the arbitary seizure of his assets by the state will have been a heinous act.
Alan.