Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ferg
Learn the context David.
You are over-reaching in your assertions the obviously tongue in cheek (because 'good' and 'civil war' are an oxymoron) comment "makes it more likely that someone will be hurt or killed". Wrong and hyperbolic given the fractional reach and influence of ST.
If you will provide references to the context which you believe justifies Balance's post #1150 (which was posted in response to Bjauck's comment about Maori seeking radical reform)
"Nothing like a good civil war in NZ to sort it out once and for all."
We can continue this discussion, but until you do, we can't take it further.
You may believe (or pretend to believe) Balance was tongue in cheek. In view of his posting history (his posts in relation to threats of violence to Jacinda Adern for example), I don't.
You may believe (or pretend to believe) a post like that is acceptable in public discourse. I don't.
You may believe a post like that is harmless because ST has little reach. I don't
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ferg
BTW we all abhor threats and acts of violence, of which civil war is a subset.
Good. A pity you didn't say so three pages earlier.