Originally Posted by
Enumerate
I have called for a demonstration of a clear case in which "the Public Interest" is protected by the Statutory Management of Allan Hubbard.
I would point out that related party transactions are NOT a demonstration of "the Public Interest". That basically silences about the only criticism leveled at Allan Hubbard.
So ... where is this evidence of impropriety? .... silence ....
Given this, how can there be a case of protection of "the Public Interest"? ... silence ....
Given this, how can there be a case for the Statutory Management of Allan Hubbard? ... silence ...
Does Minister Power have a case to answer for abuse of his executive powers? This is becoming a very interesting question ... I think there will be alot to be said about this in the near future.