You tube " Eva b77w LAX"
ATC tape of recent departure LAX where EVA nearly buried one of their aircraft in the hills to the north
Printable View
You tube " Eva b77w LAX"
ATC tape of recent departure LAX where EVA nearly buried one of their aircraft in the hills to the north
December monthly update is in.
Looks to be in line with forecast, yield per passenger better. On flights with good synergies, high frequency and lower costs, lower RASk's are OK.
Can someone please take the time to educate me on what RASK, ASK, and RPK is and what we are looking for in these to assess performance. Thanks in advance.
RPK is revenue per passenger kilometre, but aircraft may be only half full that is why they also report load factors.
RASK revenue available seat kilometre, ie capacity. On routes that have lower costs usually associated with higher frequencies lower RASKs are acceptable.
Thanks peat. So a higher RASK means more profitable and a reduction in RASK means they have been less profitable from the previous update or time period. Is that correct?