They couldn’t even deliver any of the last round of bullsh1t that they promised.
Who in their right mind would believe any of the absolute sh1te they dream up now?
If they snivel back in it will just be more mess for National to clean up later.
Let’s hope voters see through the spin on a couple of years time. I think National need a couple of terms at least to see what they can do.
First term will mostly be clean up and stabilisation.
Chris Hipkins has told Labour members at an Auckland conference he envisages the party getting back into power in two years and then spending a decade building a strong economy
Labour, Labour with Robbo as Finance Spinner, Labour with Hipkins as Head Honcho dreamer have well and truly proven they can't build pussy and never will until they grow a pair and chop away the characteristic clouds of Pink BS
and that only likely a very long way off with Hipkins well and truly gone
The Kiwi Voters are not stupid to the spinning BS Artists who produced very little in the most recent 6 years
and it will probably take a long time before they get f-Witted again by the clueless bunch of Labour / Green wannebie triers promising every under the sun .. achieve nothing
Australia noticing the tens of thousands of NZers (mostly young and skilled) leaving Aotearoa with half of them migrating to Australia.
Watch the flow become a tsunami when the unemployment numbers (engineered by buffoon Adrian Orr & Hysterical Hapless Hipkins/Clueless Cindy) go above 5%.
And good luck & best wishes to each and everyone of them - they go with the goodwill of all NZers who are objective and know that NZ is heading towards 2nd world status rapidly.
Why should they & their children carry the burden of the tens of billions of dollars of debt built up by Ardern & Robertson with NOTHING to show but more beneficiaries, parasites, losers and criminals.
Why would he put such a repeated effort in this mornings Q&A, to try to get Todd McClay, Trade Minister, to make negative comments and judgements against our trading partners?
Disgraceful!
What is his motivation on state funded broadcasting to commit such treachery?
Australia noticing the tens of thousands of NZers (mostly young and skilled) leaving Aotearoa with half of them migrating to Australia.
Watch the flow become a tsunami when the unemployment numbers (engineered by buffoon Adrian Orr & Hysterical Hapless Hipkins/Clueless Cindy) go above 5%.
And good luck & best wishes to each and everyone of them - they go with the goodwill of all NZers who are objective and know that NZ is heading towards 2nd world status rapidly.
Why should they & their children carry the burden of the tens of billions of dollars of debt built up by Ardern & Robertson with NOTHING to show but more beneficiaries, parasites, losers and criminals.
Guy from Westpac agrees with you ….as NZ unemployment rate increases faster than in Aussie the differential as per dark line will increasecand green line being net Kiwis leaving will also increase
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
Why would he put such a repeated effort in this mornings Q&A, to try to get Todd McClay, Trade Minister, to make negative comments and judgements against our trading partners?
Disgraceful!
What is his motivation on state funded broadcasting to commit such treachery?
Fortunately for NZ, McClay weathered the storm.
I didn't think there was anything wrong with the interview.
Treachery 🤣 Tame's job is to ask tough questions and he did, he could've really got stuck in regarding sheepgate.
McClay handled himself well & it was a good robust interview, but perhaps you think the media should go soft on the Government,
Hopefully you find my posts helpful, but in no way should they be construed as advice. Make your own decision.
Luxon said that Labour’s questions to him each sitting week “was a bit like an arsonist returning to the scene of a fire that they started and then criticising the fire brigade for the means by which it is extinguishing the fire.
“It’s a surreal experience to go through, I’ve got to be honest,” with you,” he said.
Australia noticing the tens of thousands of NZers (mostly young and skilled) leaving Aotearoa with half of them migrating to Australia.
Watch the flow become a tsunami when the unemployment numbers (engineered by buffoon Adrian Orr & Hysterical Hapless Hipkins/Clueless Cindy) go above 5%.
And good luck & best wishes to each and everyone of them - they go with the goodwill of all NZers who are objective and know that NZ is heading towards 2nd world status rapidly.
Why should they & their children carry the burden of the tens of billions of dollars of debt built up by Ardern & Robertson with NOTHING to show but more beneficiaries, parasites, losers and criminals.
New Zealand surely doesn’t need to drown in a tsunami of debt and post-Budget deficits into the future when it can raise funds from selling shareholdings in prime assets, restrain new spending and tax capital gains.
To achieve economic growth, we need to increase the rewards for working an hour, for investing another dollar or hiring another worker. We won’t do that by simply declaring higher nominal wage rates for everyone which are eaten up by inflation, or by slugging people with higher and higher marginal tax rates. We do it by letting them keep more of the money they earn.
Dann said superannuation and CGT are some of the key factors in why New Zealand is “languishing” compared to our transtasman neighbours.
“For me, there are two key things Australia has that we don’t. Compulsory superannuation savings and a capital gains tax have made a huge difference across decades of economic growth.
Yes Robertson and Ardern have been terrible for NZ particularly future generations, but what is the solution now that they are gone?
Does NZ have more beneficiaries than Aussie? If not then that may not be the problem. How does our welfare spend compare to them as a percentage of GDP?
Last edited by Aaron; Today at 11:54 AM.
Reason: GDP
I didn't think there was anything wrong with the interview.
Treachery 🤣 Tame's job is to ask tough questions and he did, he could've really got stuck in regarding sheepgate.
McClay handled himself well & it was a good robust interview, but perhaps you think the media should go soft on the Government,
Naivety of the highest order.
It's one thing to ask a question that's not in NZ's international interest, but to persist several times to get a different answer, when McClay has given an adequate diplomatic answer, is unpatriotic on Tame's part.
Who is he serving?
Imagine if Tame got the answer he tried so hard to get, then it was broadcast on Chinese and Indian news!
Originally Posted by mistaTea
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks